Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
In the Matter of John J. McLaughlin, Respondent, v. James Connors, Appellant, Impleaded with Others
185 N.Y. 545·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of John J. McLaughlin, Respondent, v. James Connors, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
Matter of McLaughlin v. Connors, 112 App. Div. 906, affirmed.
(Argued April 18, 1906;
decided May 8, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 9, 1906, which affirmed an order of Special Term declaring void a primary election held in the ninth ward of the city of Watervliet, September 19, 1905, and directing that a special primary election be held for the election of a member of the Democratic general committee of the county of Albany from said ward.
William V. Cooke for appellant.
A. J. Danaher for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, with leave to apply to the Supreme Court, or a justice thereof, to fix a date for the new primary election; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Chase, JJ.; Willard Bartlett, J., votes for modification by striking out the direction for a new election.