General
Horsman Dolls, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Commission
342 U.S. 890·Supreme Court of the United States·1951
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
December 3, 1951.
No. 398.
Horsman Dolls, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Commission.
Samuel Kaufman and Nathan Bidder for appellant-petitioner.
Theodore D. Parsons, Attorney General of New Jersey, Joseph A. Murphy, Assistant Deputy Attorney General, Herman D. Ringle and Charles A. Malloy for appellee-respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the
appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction, 28 U. S. C. § 1257 (2). The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.