Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
O'QUAIN et al. v. UNITED STATES
31 F.2d 756·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1929
Before BRYAN and FOSTER, Circuit Judges, and GRUBB, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
O’QUAIN et al. v. UNITED STATES.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
April 1, 1929.
No. 5449.
Thos. Arthur Edwards, of Lake Charles, La., for appellants.
Philip H. Meeom, U. S. Atty., and J. Fair Hardin, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Shreve= port, La.
Before BRYAN and FOSTER, Circuit Judges, and GRUBB, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — FOSTER, Circuit Judge.]
FOSTER, Circuit Judge.
This is a suit brought by a mother to recover on a policy of war risk insurance of $10,000, payable to the estate of her illegitimate son. The father is living, but has transferred any rights he may have to the mother. The petition was dismissed by the District Court, upon sustaining various exceptions, mainly that of no cause of action, as will appear from his well-considered opinion. 28 F.(2d) 350.
The petition is inartificially drawn, but discloses all the faets which, if sustained by proof, would be sufficient to dispose of the case on the merits. It is contended that the ■ mother is entitled to recover on the policy as the heir of her son, and, in the alternative, then as the person standing in loco parentis to the soldier. Both of these contentions are disposed of adversely and conclusively by the opinion of the District Court.
It is further contended that, if the mother cannot inherit, then the policy should be paid to the natural brothers and sisters, of which there are several. This was disposed of by the District Court on a plea of misjoinder of parties. It is argued that, if the mother is not allowed to inherit for failure to have properly acknowledged the child, she should be considered civilly dead, and the brothers and sisters allowed to take her place. To sustain this, reliance is had on article 923 of the Civil Code of Louisiana, which provides that, if the mother and father of a natural child have died before him, his estate shall pass to his natural brothers and sisters, or to their descendants.
However much we might be disposed to permit amendment to the pleadings to bring pertinent questions properly before the court in cases of this Mnd, it would be useless to do so in this ease, as we are bound to follow the decisions of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and it is well settled that natural brothers and sisters cannot inherit the estate of an illegitimate child, unless he has been acknowledged by the parents. Succession of Gravier, 125 La. 733, 51 So. 704.
The record presents no reversible error.
Affirmed.