Contracts · MBE-tested

STAMLER et al. v. WILLIS et al.

393 U.S. 407·Supreme Court of the United States·1969

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

STAMLER et al. v. WILLIS et al. No. 478. Decided January 20, 1969. Albert E. Jenner, Jr., Thomas P. Sullivan, and Arthur Kinoy for appellants in No. 478 on the petition for rehearing and motion to amend. Together with No. 479, Cohen v. Willis et al., also on appeal from the same court. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. The petition for a rehearing is denied. The motion to amend the judgment entered on November 25, 1968, dismissing the appeals is granted. The judgment dismissing the appeals is vacated and a new judgment will issue providing that the judgment below be vacated and the cases be remanded to the District Court so that it may enter a fresh decree from which timely appeals may be taken to the Court of Appeals. Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.