Bankruptcy
BIRD et al. v. CITY OF RICHMOND
247 F. 1002·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1917
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BIRD et al. v. CITY OF RICHMOND.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
March 14, 1917.)
No. 1461.
On Petition to Superintend and Revise, in Matter of Law, Proceedings of the District Court of the United States at Richmond, Va., in Bankruptcy.
James E. Cannon, of Richmond, Va., for petitioners.
H. R. Pollard, City Atty., and Geo. Wayne Anderson, Asst. City Atty., both of Richmond, Va., for respondent.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment of District Court reversed, 240 Fed. 545, 153 C. C. A. 349. June 27, 1917, writ of certiorari of Supreme Court presented.