General
Frozen Food Express v. United States et al.; Interstate Commerce Commission v. Frozen Food Express et al.; American Trucking Associations et al. v. Frozen Food Express et al.; Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railroad Co. et al. v. Frozen Food Express et al.; and East Texas Motor Freight Lines, Inc. et al. v. Frozen Food Express et al.
350 U.S. 815·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 158.
Nos. 159 and 163.
No. 160.
Nos. 161 and 164.
No. 162.
Frozen Food Express v. United States et al.; Interstate Commerce Commission v. Frozen Food Express et al.; American Trucking Associations et al. v. Frozen Food Express et al.; Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railroad Co. et al. v. Frozen Food Express et al.; and East Texas Motor Freight Lines, Inc. et al. v. Frozen Food Express et al.
Carl L. Phinney for Frozen Food Express. Leo H. Pou for appellant in No. 159. With him was Samuel R. Howell for appellant in No. 163. Rollo E. Kidwell for appellants in No. 160. Peter T. Beardsley for the American Trucking Associations, Inc., and Clarence D. Todd and Dale C. Dillon for the Common Carrier Conference Irregular Route et al., appellants in Nos. 160 and 162. David G. Macdonald and Francis W. Mclnerny for the East Texas Motor Freight Lines et al., appellants in No. 162. Joseph H. Hays, Carl Helmetag, Jr. and Charles P. Reynolds for the Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railroad Co. et al., appellants in Nos. 161 and 164. Solicitor General Sobe-loff, Assistant Attorney General Barnes, Daniel M. Friedman, Robert L. Farrington and Neil Brooks for the United States and the Secretary of Agriculture, appellees in Nos. 162, 163 and 164.
[MAJORITY]
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. Probable jurisdiction noted.
Reported below: 128 F. Supp. 374.