General
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edgar C. Ackerman, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Houghton & Doran, and Others, Defendants. Carlisle Rowntree, Appellant
223 A.D. 847·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1928·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edgar C. Ackerman, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Houghton & Doran, and Others, Defendants. Carlisle Rowntree, Appellant.
(Appeal No. 1.)
[MAJORITY]
Order denying motion to dismiss complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disburse-' ments. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.