Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FAMILY AND LIFE ADVOCATES, dba NIFLA, et al., petitioners, v. Xavier BECERRA, Attorney General of California, et al., 2017 — 138 S. Ct. 464 · caselaw · US
Constitutional Law · MBE-tested
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FAMILY AND LIFE ADVOCATES, dba NIFLA, et al., petitioners, v. Xavier BECERRA, Attorney General of California, et al.
138 S. Ct. 464199 L. Ed. 2d 328·Supreme Court of the United States·2017
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FAMILY AND LIFE ADVOCATES, dba NIFLA, et al., petitioners,
v.
Xavier BECERRA, Attorney General of California, et al.
No. 16-1140.
Supreme Court of the United States
Nov. 13, 2017.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted and limited to the following question: "Whether the disclosures required by the California Reproductive FACT Act violate the protections set forth in the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment, applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment."