Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Tax
APOLLO STEEL CO., Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
41 F.2d 986·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
APOLLO STEEL CO., Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
No. 4155.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
June 16, 1930.
Paul Armitage, of New York City, for petitioner.
G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key and John V. Groner, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen. (C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and R. N. Shaw, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel)', for respondent. '
Before BUFFINGTON and WOOLLEY, Circuit Judges, and SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This ease is affirmed on the case of Cramer and King Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 41 F.(2d) 24, and the question of abnormality was for the Commissioner, not this court, to determine.