Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Tax
Annie L. SIEGEL et al., Petitioners, v. David H. BLAIR, Commissioner of Internal Revenue
25 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Annie L. SIEGEL et al., Petitioners, v. David H. BLAIR, Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
January 3, 1928.
No. 319 Orig.
On Petition to Review Decision of United States Board of Tax Appeals.
Rhodes E. Cave and T. S. McPheeters, both of St. Louis, Mo., and George Weitzel, of Washington, D. C., for petitioners.
A. W. Gregg and H. R. Gamble, both of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Petition to review denied for want of jurisdiction and dismissed, without costs to either party in this court, on motion of respondent.