Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Constitutional Law · MBE-tested
Pedigo et al. v. Celanese Corporation; Carroll et al. v. Celanese Corporation; Alred et al. v. Celanese Corporation; and Womack v. Celanese Corporation
338 U.S. 937·Supreme Court of the United States·1950
Mr. Justice Black thinks petitioners were denied due process of law and that the petition should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nos. 393 and 398.
No. 394.
Nos. 395 and 397.
Nos. 396 and 399.
Pedigo et al. v. Celanese Corporation; Carroll et al. v. Celanese Corporation; Alred et al. v. Celanese Corporation; and Womack v. Celanese Corporation.
Isadore Katz and Warren E. Hall, Jr. for petitioners. Barry Wright for respondent. Arthur J. Goldberg and Thomas E. Harris filed a brief for the Congress of Industrial Organizations, as amicus curiae, supporting the petition.
[MAJORITY]
Supreme Court of Georgia. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Black thinks petitioners were denied due process of law and that the petition should be granted.