Corporations
NEAL PUBLISHING COMPANY, Respondent, v. WILLIAM McDEVITT et al., as Election Commissioners of the City and County of San Francisco, Appellants
28 Cal. App. 801·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1915·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Civ. No. 1529.
First Appellate District.
July 12, 1915.]
NEAL PUBLISHING COMPANY, Respondent, v. WILLIAM McDEVITT et al., as Election Commissioners of the City and County of San Francisco, Appellants.
Municipal Corporations — San Francisco — Charter Provisions — Printing—Hours op Labor—Price por Work for Citt.—Judgment affirmed on the authority of Neal Publishing Company v. Rolph, 169 Cal. 190.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. M. Seawell, Judge.
The facts are similar to those stated in Neal Publishing Company v. Rolph, 169 Cal. 190, [146 Pac. 659],
Percy V. Long, City Attorney, J. F. English, Assistant City Attorney, and George B. Benham, for Appellants.
W. B. Kollmyer, for Respondent.
[MAJORITY — THE COURT.]
THE COURT.
Upon the authority of the case of Neal Publishing Co. v. Rolph, 169 Cal. 190, [146 Pac. 659], the judgment is affirmed.