General
Thomas E. O'Brien et al., Respondents, v. Town of Huntington et al., Appellants. (Action No. 1.); Thurston K. Whitson et al., Respondents, v. Town of Huntington et al., Appellants. (Action No. 2.); Ruth Terry et al., Respondents, v. Town of Huntington et al., Appellants. (Action No. 3.); Royce W. Tabor et al., Respondents, v. Town of Huntington et al., Appellants. (Action No. 4.); Margaret Lockhart et al., Respondents, v. Town of Huntington et al., Appellants. (Action No. 5.); Robert D. Deasy et al., Respondents, v. Town of Huntington et al., Appellants. (Action No. 6.); Robert D. Deasy et al., Respondents, v. Town of Huntington et al., Appellants. (Action No. 7.)
297 A.D.2d 315746 N.Y.S.2d 270·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2002·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas E. O’Brien et al., Respondents, v Town of Huntington et al., Appellants. (Action No. 1.) Thurston K. Whitson et al., Respondents, v Town of Huntington et al., Appellants. (Action No. 2.) Ruth Terry et al., Respondents, v Town of Huntington et al., Appellants. (Action No. 3.) Royce W. Tabor et al., Respondents, v Town of Huntington et al., Appellants. (Action No. 4.) Margaret Lockhart et al., Respondents, v Town of Huntington et al., Appellants. (Action No. 5.) Robert D. Deasy et al., Respondents, v Town of Huntington et al., Appellants. (Action No. 6.) Robert D. Deasy et al., Respondents, v Town of Huntington et al., Appellants. (Action No. 7.)
[746 NYS2d 270]
[MAJORITY]
By decision and order on motion of this Court, dated March 21, 2002, in a related appeal bearing Appellate Division Docket No. 2002-01676, all proceedings in the above-entitled actions were stayed pending the hearing and determination of that appeal. On April 1, 2002, the Supreme Court issued the sua sponte order now appealed from. That order was made in violation of the stay of all proceedings contained in this Court’s decision and order dated March 21, 2002. Accordingly, the order is summarily reversed, and the answers are reinstated. Santucci, J.P., Altman, Townes and Crane, JJ., concur.