General
PURYEAR v. HOGAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF NEW YORK COUNTY, et al.
396 U.S. 11·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
PURYEAR v. HOGAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF NEW YORK COUNTY, et al.
No. 336,
Misc.
Decided October 13, 1969
Frank S. Hogan, pro se, and Michael R. Juviler for Hogan, and Louis J. Lejkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Maria L. Marcus, Assistant Attorney General, for Lefkowitz, appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.