Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein [formerly Rohan] et al.; and Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Bicks et al., U. S. District Court Judges
368 U.S. 812·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 138.
No. 180,
Misc.
Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein [formerly Rohan] et al.; and Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Bicks et al., U. S. District Court Judges.
Charles H. Tuttle for petitioner. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, and Julius L. Sack-man for respondents in No. 138.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted in No. 138, and motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus granted in No. 180, Misc.
Reported below: 289 F. 2d 426.