Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Thomas M. Tyng, Appellant, v. The United States Submarine and Torpedo Boat Company, Respondent
60 N.Y. 644·New York Court of Appeals·1875·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas M. Tyng, Appellant, v. The United States Submarine and Torpedo Boat Company, Respondent.
(Argued April 1, 1875;
decided April 13, 1875.)
Reported below, 1 Hun, 161.
The prominent question presented was, that there was no evidence to sustain the findings of the referee. The .court held, that, although the evidence very decidedly preponderated in favor of plaintiff, yet there was some evidence, sufficient to make the questions those of fact, and therefore not reviewable here. As to the legal questions presented the court, without discussing them, simply concurred with Daniels, J., in court below.
Thomas M. Tyng, appellant, in person.
F. J. Fithian for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Allen, J.,]
Allen, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed