General
Arline Bronzaft, Respondent, v. Louis Goldman et al., Defendants, and Trimuse Corp., Appellant
38 A.D.2d 693·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1972·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(January 20, 1972)
Arline Bronzaft, Respondent, v. Louis Goldman et al., Defendants, and Trimuse Corp., Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 2, 1971, denying motion of the defendant-appellant for summary judgment, dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, but without prejudice to a renewal of the motion for summary judgment, if defendant-appellant is so advised, after completion of pretrial disclosure proceedings. Respondent shall recover of appellant $50 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur — Stevens, P. J., McGivern, Kupferman, Murphy and Capozzoli, JJ.