Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
The United States, appellants v. Philip R. Younge
33 U.S. 4848 Pet. 484·Supreme Court of the United States·1834
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The United States, appellants v. Philip R. Younge.
The case was submitted to the court by Mr Call, for the United States; and by Mr White, for the appellee.
[MAJORITY — Mr Chief Justice Marshall]
Mr Chief Justice Marshall
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is a claim for five thousand acres of land; part of a grant for twenty-five thousand acres, made by the governor of East Florida to the petitioner, on the 22d of February 1817. Part of this land, twenty thousand acres, was conveyed to Moses E. Levi, and both the validity of the claim, and the identity of the land were established, in the opinion given in that case.
The decree of the superior court for the district of East Florida is affirmed.
This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the superior court for the eastern district of Florida, and was argued by. counsel; on consideration whereof, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed-by this court, that the decree of the said superior court in this cause be, and the saméis hereby affirmed, in all respects.