Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
CONTINENTAL OIL CO. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
313 U.S. 21285 L. Ed. 1292·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Mr. Justice Roberts took no part in the consideration or disposition of this case. · The Chief- Justice and Mr. Justice Stone reiterate the views expressed by them in the Phelps Dodge case. · Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Murphy are of opinion that the Board’s order should be affirmed for the reasons set forth by them in the Phelps Dodge case.'.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CONTINENTAL OIL CO. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.
No. 413.
Argued March 11, 1941.
Decided April 28, 1941.
Mr. John P. Akolt, with whom Messrs. James J. Cos-grove, Elmer L. Brock, E. R. Campbell, and Milton Smith were on the brief, for petitioner.
Mr. Thomas E. Harris, with whom Solicitor General Biddle and Messrs. Robert B. Watts, Laurence A. Knapp, Mortimer B. Wolf, and Morris P. Glushien were on the brief, for responden!
[MAJORITY — MR. Justice Frankfurter]
MR. Justice Frankfurter
delivered the opinion of the Court.
In its petition the Continental Oil Company challenged various provisions of an order of the Labor Board which the Circuit Court of Appeals had enforced, but we brought here only so much of the case as pertained to the reinstatement of two men, Jones and( Moore, 311 U. S. 637. Continental’s contention is that reinstatement was precluded because neither man remained an “employee” within § 2 (3) of the National Labor Relations Act. The decisive question, however, as we have ruled in the Phelps Dodge case, ante, p. 177, is whether, reinstatement will “effectuate the policies” of the Act. We therefore remand the case , for an exercise by the Board of its judgment on thát issue, in light of our opinion in the Phelps Dodge case. Remanded
Mr. Justice Roberts took no part in the consideration or disposition of this case.
The Chief- Justice and Mr. Justice Stone reiterate the views expressed by them in the Phelps Dodge case.
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Murphy are of opinion that the Board’s order should be affirmed for the reasons set forth by them in the Phelps Dodge case.'.