Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Securities
GENERAL MOTORS CORP. v. APPEAL BOARD OF THE MICHIGAN EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION et al.
385 U.S. 373·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GENERAL MOTORS CORP. v. APPEAL BOARD OF THE MICHIGAN EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION et al.
No. 658.
Decided December 12, 1966.
Aloysius F. Power for appellant.
Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and George M. Bourgon and Edward J. Setlock, Assistant Attorneys General, for the Appeal Board of the Michigan Employment Security Commission et al.; Abraham L. Zwerdling, Bruce A. Miller and Sheldon L. Klimist for Stinson et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.