General
Daniel P. Smith, Respondent, v. The Buffalo, Rochester and Pittsburgh Railroad Company, Appellant
148 N.Y. 727·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Daniel P. Smith, Respondent, v. The Buffalo, Rochester and Pittsburgh Railroad Company, Appellant.
Reported below, 72 Hun, 545.
(Argued December 3, 1895;
decided December 19, 1895.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made October 3,1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and also affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Henry G. Danforth for appellant.
E. F. Bdbcoch for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Haight, J., not sitting.