Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Overnite Transportation Co. v. National Labor Relations Board et al.
389 U.S. 838·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 215.
Overnite Transportation Co. v. National Labor Relations Board et al.
White ford S. Blakeney for petitioner.
Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for National Labor Relations Board, and David Previant and Hugh J. Beins for Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local 171, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.