Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Corporations
The People of the State of New York ex rel. James A. Deering, Appellant, v. Edward M. Grout, as Comptroller of the City of New York, et al., Respondents
177 N.Y. 586·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. James A. Deering, Appellant, v. Edward M. Grout, as Comptroller of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.
People ex rel. Peering v. Growl, 89 App. Div. 614, appeal dismissed.
(Argued February 9, 1904;
decided February 23, 1904.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 31, 1903, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel defendants to accept a certain sum in full settlement of an assessment for a local improvement.
Joel J. Squier and James A. Deervng for appellant.
John J. Delany, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connol/y, George L. Sterling and John F. O'Brien of counsel), for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Martin, Yann and Cullen, JJ.