Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Anthony P. Hoerner et al., Respondents, v. Chrysler Financial Company, L.L.C., et al., Appellants, and Mary P. Rossi, Respondent
21 A.D.3d 1253801 N.Y.S.2d 223·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2005·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Anthony P. Hoerner et al., Respondents, v Chrysler Financial Company, L.L.C., et al., Appellants, and Mary P. Rossi, Respondent.
(Appeal No. 2.)
[801 NYS2d 223]
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Rose H. Sconiers, J.), entered July 9, 2004. The judgment, upon a jury verdict, dismissed the complaint and the cross claim of defendants Chrysler Financial Company, L.L.C., Douglas J. Jank and Jay B. Jank against defendant Mary P Rossi.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Hoerner v Chrysler Fin. Co. ([appeal No. 3] 21 AD3d 1254 [2005]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Gorski, Smith and Hayes, JJ.