Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Alfred KURTZ et al., Appellants, v. Ferdinand E. ENGLISH et al.
5 F.2d 1016·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Alfred KURTZ et al., Appellants, v. Ferdinand E. ENGLISH et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
January 9, 1925.)
No. 6926.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Tobias A. Keppler, of New York City, and Edward E. Longan, of St. Louis, Mo., for appellants.
Ralph Kalisk, of St. Louis, Mo., for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal docketed and dis-. missed, with costs, on motion of appellees, under rule 16.