General

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William Shankle, Appellant

95 A.D.3d 907942 N.Y.S.2d 895·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2012·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Shankle, Appellant. [942 NYS2d 895] — [MAJORITY] Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated February 20, 2007 (People v Shankle, 37 AD3d 742 [2007]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Count, Kings County, rendered March 23, 2005. Ordered that the application is denied. The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Mastro, A.P.J, Skelos, Dillon and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.