General
Austin Wolfe, Inc. v. United States
48 Cust. Ct. 306·United States Customs Court·1962
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Before the First Division,
January 16, 1962
No. 66361.
Austin Wolfe, Inc. v. United States,
protest 58/8141 (San Francisco).
[MAJORITY — Mollison, J.]
Opinion by
Mollison, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of valances similar in all material respects to those the subject of D. N. & E. Walter & Co. et al. v. United States (43 Cust. Ct. 26, C.D. 2098), the claim at 25 percent under the provision in paragraph 409, as modified, supra, for bamboo articles was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to be the same as the merchandise the subject of C.D. 2098, supra, except that they are made of chip, were held dutiable at 25 percent under the provision in paragraph 1537 of the act for manufactures of chip, not specially provided for, by similitude under paragraph 1559, as amended.