General
Carl Goepel and Others, Composing the Firm of Schulz & Ruckgaber, Respondents, v. Leopold Zimmermann and Others, Composing the Firm of Zimmermann & Forshay, Appellants
201 A.D. 842·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1922·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Carl Goepel and Others, Composing the Firm of Schulz & Ruckgaber, Respondents, v. Leopold Zimmermann and Others, Composing the Firm of Zimmermann & Forshay, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Order of February 9, 1922, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and appeal from order of February 15, 1922, dismissed, and the case set for trial for March 27, 1922. No opinion. Present — Dowling, Laughlin, Page, Merrell and Greenbaum, JJ.