General
FAWCETT PUBLICATIONS, INC., v. MORRIS
376 U.S. 513·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted or that the petition for writ of certiorari should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
FAWCETT PUBLICATIONS, INC., v. MORRIS.
No. 57.
Decided March 23, 1964.
Howard Ellis, Perry S. Patterson, Don H. Reuben and Thomas A. Diskin for appellant.
C. E. Ram Morrison for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted or that the petition for writ of certiorari should be granted.