Administrative

Apag, Inc. v. United Stated

58 Cust. Ct. 163·United States Customs Court·1967

Before Kao and Ford, Judges

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

(C.D. 2918) Apag, Inc. v. United Stated United States Customs Court, Second Division (Decided March 13, 1967) Plaintiff not represented by counsel. Barefoot Sanders, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant. Before Kao and Ford, Judges [MAJORITY — Ford, Judge:] Ford, Judge: When the suit listed above was called, there was no appearance by plaintiff either in person or by attorney. A motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution was made on behalf of the defendant. An examination of the official papers indicates that the protest was not filed within the time prescribed by section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Accordingly, motion made on behalf of defendant is denied and the protest is dismissed as being untimely. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.