Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Lena Leyh, Appellant, v. Newburgh Electric Railway Company, Respondent
168 N.Y. 667·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lena Leyh, Appellant, v. Newburgh Electric Railway Company, Respondent.
Leyh v. Newburgh Electric By. Go., 41 App. Div. 218, affirmed.
(Argued October 30, 1901;
decided November 19, 1901.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 6, 1899, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and granting a new trial.
James C. Grojosey and Charles J. Patterson, for appellant.
Jesse W. Johnson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, and judgment absolute ordered for defendant on the stipulation, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Cb. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Landon and Werner, JJ. Not sitting; Cullen, J.