Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Charles A. G. Depew, Respondent, v. Cynthia B. Dewey, impleaded, etc., Appellant
56 N.Y. 657·New York Court of Appeals·1874·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles A. G. Depew, Respondent, v. Cynthia B. Dewey, impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Argued April 21, 1874;
decided April 28, 1874.)
An application to the Special Term of the Supreme Court to open a judgment and allow a defendant to come in and defend is addressed to the discretion of the court. The power to review that discretion belongs to the General Term. This court has no power to review the decision of the latter.
This was an appeal from, a General Term order, reversing an order of Special Term, opening the judgment herein, and allowing defendant, Cynthia B. Dewey, to come in and defend. One ground of the decision of the General Term was laches, some fourteen years having elapsed after the judgment before the motion was made. Held, as above.
Edgar S. Van Winkle for the appellant.
Thomas Nelson for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam]
Per Curiam
memorandum for dismissal of appeal.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.