General
In the Matter of Roger Marallo et al., Appellants, v. New York State Board of Elections et al., Respondents, and Matthew F. Coppola et al., Respondents
208 A.D.2d 843618 N.Y.S.2d 563·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1994·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Roger Marallo et al., Appellants, v New York State Board of Elections et al., Respondents, and Matthew F. Coppola et al., Respondents.
[618 NYS2d 563]
[MAJORITY]
In a proceeding to invalidate the nominations of Matthew F. Coppola, Kenneth W. Rudolph, and John P. DiBlasi as candidates of the Conservative Party in the general election to be held on November 8, 1994, for the public offices of Justice of the Supreme Court for the Ninth Judicial District, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), entered October 12, 1994, which dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Justice Nicolai at the Supreme Court. Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Lawrence and Pizzuto, JJ., concur. [See, — Misc 2d —.]