General
In re William HALL; Eleanor Hall, Debtors. James RIGBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William HALL; Eleanor Hall, Defendants-Appellees
41 F.3d 502·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1994
Before: SKOPIL, ALARCON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re William HALL; Eleanor Hall, Debtors. James RIGBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William HALL; Eleanor Hall, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-35934.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 30, 1994.
Before: SKOPIL, ALARCON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY]
ORDER
The opinion filed July 29, 1993 and reported at 1 F.3d 853 (1993) is withdrawn. With the opinion vacated, the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc is moot. The parties may file a renewal of the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc upon the filing of a new decision by the court.