Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
William R. Hart, Respondent, v. George M. Bowman et al., Appellants; Same, Respondent, v. Same, Appellants
109 N.Y. 644·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William R. Hart, Respondent, v. George M. Bowman et al., Appellants. Same, Respondent, v. Same, Appellants.
(Submitted April 10, 1888;
decided April 17, 1888.)
Appeals from orders of the General Term of the Supreme Oourt in the fifth judicial department, made February 11,. 1887, which affirmed orders of Special Term adjudging Henry Johnson and Maria N. Johnson guilty of contempt in proceedings supplementary to execution on a judgment in favor of plaintiff.
John H. Camp for appellants.
S. B. McIntyre for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeals on the ground that the orders of General Term are not final; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeals dismissed.