General
John BRADFORD v. STATE
26 Ala. App. 622162 So. 922·Alabama Court of Appeals·1935·AL
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
162 So. 922
John BRADFORD v. STATE.
8 Div. 188.
Court of Appeals of Alabama.
June 25, 1935.
Powell & Powell, of Hartselle, for appellant.
A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., for the State.
[MAJORITY — SAMFORD, Judge.]
SAMFORD, Judge.
We have read the evidence in this case, and find that the slate has failed to furnish evidence of a guilty scienter on the part of defendant. Defendant’s motion for a new trial should have been granted. Guin v. State, 19 Ala. App. 67, 94 So. 788.
The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.