Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
United States et al. v. Watson Bros. Transportation Co., Inc.
350 U.S. 927·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Mr. Justice Reed, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Burton would note probable jurisdiction.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 490.
United States et al. v. Watson Bros. Transportation Co., Inc.
Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Barnes, Daniel M. Friedman, William J. Lamont, Robert W. Ginnane and Leo H. Pou for appellants. Harold G. Hernly and Beverley S. Simms for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judg-
ment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Reed, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Burton would note probable jurisdiction.