Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Joe PASANO et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES
22 F.2d 1017·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1927
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joe PASANO et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
December 7, 1927.
No. 7780.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri.
Charles S. Walden, of Joplin, Mo., and Harry L. Donnelly, J. Pearce Kane, and William G. Lynch, all of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiffs in error.
Roscoe C. Patterson, U. S. Atty., and Robert R. Brewster, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Kansas City, Mo.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment reversed, and cause remanded, on confession of error.