General
United States v. Gerdau Co.
6 Ct. Cust. 97·United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals·1915
Before Montgomery, Smith, Barber, De Vries, and Martin, Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
United States v. Gerdau Co.
(No. 1467).
Boxwood Sticks in the Rough.
The facts are the same; it was heard concurrently with, and is ruled by United States v. Benneche (6 Ct. Gust. Appls., 92; T. D. 35339).
United States Court of Customs Appeals,
April 14, 1915.
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 36725 (T. D. 34865).
[Affirmed.]
Bert Ilanson, Assistant Attorney General {John J. Mulvaney, special attorney, on the brief), for the United States.
No appearance for appellees.
Before Montgomery, Smith, Barber, De Vries, and Martin, Judges.
Reported in T. D. 35340 (28 Treas. Dec., 680).
[MAJORITY — Barber, Judge,]
Barber, Judge,
delivered the opinion of the court:
This case was heard in conjunction with the case of United States v. Benneche (6 Ct. Cust. Appls., 92; T. D. 35339), decision in which is handed down concurrently herewith, and the Government relies upon its argument in that case for its discussion of the issues involved here, which it concedes are .the same.
No brief was filed by counsel for the importers, but the importers have furnished the court a letter containing briefly their answer to the Government’s assignment of errors.
Our decision in the Benneche case is conclusive of the issues here and may be referred to.
The judgment of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed.