General
SAMUEL BRASK et al., Respondents, v. FRANK BARNET, as Sheriff, etc., et al., Appellants
49 Cal. App. 797·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1920·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Civ. No. 3541.
First Appellate District, Division One.
November 3, 1920.]
SAMUEL BRASK et al., Respondents, v. FRANK BAR-NET, as Sheriff, etc., et al., Appellants.
Quieting Title—Character op Conveyance—Findings—-Evidence. Judgment affirmed on the authority of Braok v. Cox et al., ante, p. 721.
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. A. F. St. Sure, Judge.
Affirmed.
The facts are the same as those stated in the opinion in Brask v. Cox et al., ante, p. 721 [194 Pac. 292].
F. A. Berlin for Appellants.
J. E. Hood and Chas. E. Snook for Respondents.
[MAJORITY — THE COURT.]
THE COURT.
The facts in this case are identical with those in the case of Brask v. Cox et al., ante, p. 721, [194 Pac. 292], and which are fully set forth in said decision, wherein the judgment was affirmed. It follows that the judgment herein must be affirmed, and it is so ordered.