GURVICH v. UNITED STATES.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
October 22, 1906.)
No. 1,046.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the First Division of the District of Alaska.
Malony & Cobb, for plaintiff in error.
John J. Boyce and Marshall B. Woodworth, U. S. Attys.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
In conformity with the opinion and mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States (25 Sup. Ct. 803, 49 L. Ed. 1172) it is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said District Court in this cause be, and hereby is, reversed, and tiie cause is remanded to the said District Court for a new trial. See, also, Rassmussen v. U. S., 25 Sup. Ct. 514, 49 L. Ed. 862.