Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Carolina Power & Light Co. v. South Carolina Public Service Authority et al.; South Carolina Power Co. v. South Carolina Public Service Authority; and South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. v. South Carolina Public Service Authority et al.
304 U.S. 578·Supreme Court of the United States·1938
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 999.
No. 1000.
No. 1001.
Carolina Power & Light Co. v. South Carolina Public Service Authority et al.; South Carolina Power Co. v. South Carolina Public Service Authority; and South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. v. South Carolina Public Service Authority et al.
May 23, 1938.
Messrs. Arthur R. Young, Wm. M. Rogers, Raymond T. Jackson, and W. C. McLain for petitioners.
Messrs. R. M. Jefferies and W. J. McLeod, Jr. for the Public Service Authority and its Board of Directors.
Solicitor General Jackson, Assistant Attorney General Morris, and Messrs. Paul A. Freund, Robert E. Sher, and Enoch E. Ellison for federal officers Harold L. Ickes and Harry L. Hopkins.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.