General
Adler et al. v. Cincinnati et al.
303 U.S. 622·Supreme Court of the United States·1938
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 778.
Adler et al. v. Cincinnati et al.
Decided March 7, 1938.
Mr. Edward M. Ballard for appellants. Mr. John D. Ellis for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Bellingham Bay & B. C. R. Co. v. New Whatcom, 172 U. S. 314, 320; Ballard v. Hunter, 204 U. S. 241, 262; North Laramie Land Co. v. Hoffman, 268 U. S. 276, 283; Witzelberg v. Cincinnati, 302 U. S. 635.