Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
HEARNE et al. v. SMYLIE, GOVERNOR OF IDAHO, et al.
381 U.S. 42014 L. Ed. 2d 476·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HEARNE et al. v. SMYLIE, GOVERNOR OF IDAHO, et al.
No. 617.
Decided June 1, 1965.
Herman J. McDevitt for appellants.
Allan G. Shepard, Attorney General of Idaho, and M. AUyn Dingel, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Williams et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The appeal in this case concerns an order of the United States District Court for the District of Idaho staying this reapportionment suit until 30 days after the adjournment of the 1965 Session of the Idaho Legislature. The Idaho Legislature, after adopting a new reapportionment plan, adjourned on March 25, 1965. The stay order now having expired by its own terms and the District Court and the parties now being in a position to proceed promptly with this litigation, the motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed.