Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Mondakota Gas Co. et al. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
352 U.S. 846·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 157.
Mondakota Gas Co. et al. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
James R. Browning and Ellis Lyons for petitioners. Simon E. Sobeloff, then Solicitor General, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Melvin Richter, Willard W. Gatchell and Joseph B. Hobbs for the Federal Power Commission, and James A. Murray and Philip F. Herrick for the Montana-Dakota Utilities Co., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.