General

Dorothy L. Rogers, an Infant, by John B. Rogers, Her Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. The City of Binghamton, Respondent

186 N.Y. 595·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Dorothy L. Rogers, an Infant, by John B. Rogers, Her Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. The City of Binghamton, Respondent. Rogers v. City of Binghamton, 101 App. Div. 352, affirmed, (Argued November 20, 1906; decided December 4, 1906.) Appeal'from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 12, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by .the court at a Trial Term, and an. order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through the failure of the defendant to prevent the riding of bicycles on the sidewalks of its streets. Thomas J. Keenan for appellant. Burr W. Mosher for respondent. [MAJORITY] Judgment affirmed^ with costs; no opinion. Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscocii, JJ.