General
DINGELSTEDT & CO. v. UNITED STATES
139 F. 1007·United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York·1905
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
DINGELSTEDT & CO. v. UNITED STATES.
(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.
May 17, 1905.)
No. 3,646.
On Application for Review of a Decision of the Board of United States General Appraisers.
Comstock & Wash-burn (Albert H. Washburn, of counsel), for importers.
Charles Duane Baker, Asst. U. S. Atty.
[MAJORITY — TOWNSEND, Circuit Judge]
TOWNSEND, Circuit Judge
(orally). The testimony taken in this court conclusively shows that the articles in question fall within the provisions of paragraph 400 of the act of 1897 (Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule M, 30 Stat. 188 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1672]), which provides for lithographic prints exceeding .008 and not exceeding .020 of an inch in thickness, and not exceeding 35 square inches cutting size in dimensions, as claimed by the importer. The decision of the Board of Appraisers is therefore reversed.