Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
The Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company of Texas, Plaintiff in Error, v. Oliver Letot
231 U.S. 738·Supreme Court of the United States·1913
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 44.
The Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company of Texas, Plaintiff in Error, v. Oliver Letot.
In error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fourth Supreme Judicial District of the State of Texas.
Submitted by plaintiff in error November 5, 1913.
Decided November 10, 1913.
Mr. Joseph M. Bryson for the plaintiff in error. No appearance for the defendant in error-
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction on the authority of Missouri, Kansas &, Texas Railway Company v. May, 194 U. S. 267.