Criminal Law · MBE-tested
Robert BOGARD and George Willis v. STATE of Arkansas
305 Ark. 391807 S.W.2d 468·Arkansas Supreme Court·1991·AR
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Robert BOGARD and George Willis v. STATE of Arkansas
RC 91-20
807 S.W.2d 468
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered April 29, 1991
Clyde Lee, for appellants.
No response.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Appellants, Robert Bogard and George Willis, by their attorney, have filed for a rule on the clerk.
Their attorney, Clyde E. Lee, admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part.
We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause-to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.