General
Charles A. Bernam and William Tyson, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Bernam & Tyson, and Others, Respondents, v. Harry E. Hecht, Appellant
228 A.D. 824·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1930·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles A. Bernam and William Tyson, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Bernam & Tyson, and Others, Respondents, v. Harry E. Hecht, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Stay granted for thirty days to enable appellant to apply to the Court of Appeals. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Seudder, JJ.